Cardflo vs Adyen
Adyen and Cardflo target overlapping enterprise and mid-market segments. The difference is structural: Adyen settles every transaction itself, while Cardflo routes across multiple acquirers, including Adyen-class ones, so merchants get redundancy and price competition rather than single-rail dependency.
When Cardflo is the right fit
- ✓You want acquirer redundancy and the ability to fail over between Tier 1 acquirers
- ✓You're mid-market and find Adyen's enterprise sales motion heavy for your stage
- ✓You want a specialist for high-risk verticals Adyen does not board
- ✓You value transparent interchange-plus pricing with negotiated processor margin
When Adyen is the right fit
- •You are a global enterprise (>$1B GMV) and want a single integrated acquirer
- •Adyen's unified commerce (in-store + online + capital) matches your model
- •You prefer to consolidate processing on one balance-sheet partner
Feature comparison
| Capability | Cardflo | Adyen |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Interchange-plus from 0.4% | Interchange++ plus processing markup |
| Acquirer model | Multi-acquirer orchestration | Single integrated acquirer |
| High-risk verticals | Yes, specialist acquirers | Selective; many high-risk verticals not boarded |
| Mid-market fit | Optimised for $5M–$500M GMV | Optimised for >$100M GMV |
| Integration | Single API across acquirers and APMs | Single Adyen API |
FAQ
Is Cardflo as global as Adyen?
Cardflo's acquirer partners cover UK, EU, US, LATAM, APAC and MENA. Coverage is comparable in those regions; Adyen has deeper coverage in specific markets like Brazil and Japan with proprietary licences.
Get started
Ready for velocity?
Tell us about your business. We'll match you with the right acquiring partners and the right route, typically inside a week.
