Cardflo vs Adyen

Adyen and Cardflo target overlapping enterprise and mid-market segments. The difference is structural: Adyen settles every transaction itself, while Cardflo routes across multiple acquirers, including Adyen-class ones, so merchants get redundancy and price competition rather than single-rail dependency.

When Cardflo is the right fit

  • You want acquirer redundancy and the ability to fail over between Tier 1 acquirers
  • You're mid-market and find Adyen's enterprise sales motion heavy for your stage
  • You want a specialist for high-risk verticals Adyen does not board
  • You value transparent interchange-plus pricing with negotiated processor margin

When Adyen is the right fit

  • You are a global enterprise (>$1B GMV) and want a single integrated acquirer
  • Adyen's unified commerce (in-store + online + capital) matches your model
  • You prefer to consolidate processing on one balance-sheet partner

Feature comparison

CapabilityCardfloAdyen
Pricing modelInterchange-plus from 0.4%Interchange++ plus processing markup
Acquirer modelMulti-acquirer orchestrationSingle integrated acquirer
High-risk verticalsYes, specialist acquirersSelective; many high-risk verticals not boarded
Mid-market fitOptimised for $5M–$500M GMVOptimised for >$100M GMV
IntegrationSingle API across acquirers and APMsSingle Adyen API

FAQ

Is Cardflo as global as Adyen?

Cardflo's acquirer partners cover UK, EU, US, LATAM, APAC and MENA. Coverage is comparable in those regions; Adyen has deeper coverage in specific markets like Brazil and Japan with proprietary licences.

Get started

Ready for velocity?

Tell us about your business. We'll match you with the right acquiring partners and the right route, typically inside a week.

Apply now