Risco

Gestão de litígios

A plataforma de gestão de litígios Cardflo oferece uma abordagem estruturada para a gestão de todos os desacordos de clientes, desde a questão inicial até à resolução final.

Este sistema agiliza a comunicação, automatiza a recolha de provas e oferece fluxos de trabalho claros para resolver litígios de forma eficiente, minimizando o seu impacto no seu negócio.

Categoria
Risco
Funcionalidades
10
Disponível em
Todos os planos
Candidatar-me agora

A visão geral

Dispute management within the payments ecosystem refers to the technical and administrative processes used to address transaction challenges, specifically chargebacks and retrieval requests.

When a cardholder questions a transaction, the issuer initiates a formal process via the card schemes, such as Visa or Mastercard, which requires the merchant to either accept the liability or defend the transaction with evidence.

The process sits between the acquirer and the merchant, acting as a data aggregation layer that synchronises transaction records with scheme-specific requirements. Effective management involves monitoring representment windows, analysing reason codes, and organising compelling evidence to prove the validity of a sale.

Failure to manage these disputes accurately often leads to the loss of both the transaction value and the associated fees, while also increasing the merchant's dispute-to-transaction ratio.

Maintaining this ratio within scheme-mandated thresholds is critical to avoiding fines or the revocation of a Merchant Identification Number.

Como funciona

  1. Initial Dispute Notification

    The process begins when an issuer transmits a dispute notification through the card network to the acquirer.

    Systemic monitoring detects these signals immediately, categorising the dispute by its reason code, such as fraud, non-receipt of goods, or technical errors, and establishing the formal response deadline based on scheme rules.

  2. Automated Evidence Compilation

    Transaction metadata, including authorisation logs, AVS results, CVV confirmations, and digital signatures, is retrieved from the gateway and order databases.

    The system organises these data points into a standardised response package, ensuring that specific requirements for the relevant reason code are met before the representment occurs.

  3. Representment Submission Process

    The compiled evidence is transmitted back to the acquirer to be presented to the issuer.

    This stage requires precise formatting to ensure the issuer can easily verify that the merchant followed all protocols during the initial authorisation and capture phase, aiming to overturn the provisional debit.

  4. Status Tracking and Resolution

    Throughout the lifecycle, the system tracks the dispute status, recording whether it is won, lost, or progressed to arbitration.

    Final outcomes are analysed to identify patterns in buyer behaviour or technical failures, allowing the merchant to adjust their risk parameters or operational practises for future transactions.

Por que importa

Preservation of Merchant Standing

Card schemes monitor the frequency and volume of disputes relative to total sales. If a merchant exceeds predefined thresholds, typically around 1%, they may be placed into monitoring programmes.

These programmes involve increased fees, mandatory audits, and potential termination of processing privileges. Proactive management ensures the dispute ratio remains within acceptable bounds, protecting the core ability to accept payments.

Recovery of Contested Revenue

A significant portion of disputes, often termed friendly fraud, involves legitimate transactions that cardholders contest due to confusion or intent to bypass refund policies. Without a structured representment process, this revenue is automatically lost.

Systematic evidence submission allows businesses to recover funds from valid authorisations, directly impacting the bottom line by reversing unjustifiable chargebacks.

Casos de uso

Digital Subscription Services

Platforms managing recurring billing often face disputes regarding forgotten cancellations. Managing these requires proof of the specific terms and conditions accepted, along with records of the initial transaction and subsequent dunning attempts.

High-Volume Retail Operations

Large merchants use centralised dispute tools to handle heavy volumes of shipping-related claims, linking tracking numbers and proof-of-delivery documents to the transaction record to mitigate claims of non-receipt.

Cross-Border Marketplaces

Entities operating across multiple jurisdictions use these systems to navigate varying scheme rules and timeframes, ensuring that international disputes are addressed within the specific local regulatory and network constraints.

Em números

20–40%
Industry representment success

This represents the typical range for successfully contested disputes across the retail sector, depending heavily on the quality of documentation and the specific reason codes involved.

£15–£40
Average dispute fee

This is a standard administrative fee charged by acquirers for each dispute filed, regardless of whether the merchant eventually wins the case through representment.

14–20 days
Standard response window

The typical timeframe allowed by card networks for a merchant to submit evidence before a case is permanently forfeited in favour of the cardholder.

Ready to route with Gestão de litígios?

Talk to our team about a live rollout on your acquiring stack.

Candidatar-me agora

O que obtém com Gestão de litígios

  • Painel de controlo centralizado para todos os casos de litígio
  • Recolha automatizada de provas a partir de dados de transações
  • Ferramentas de comunicação para interação direta com o cliente
  • Automação do fluxo de trabalho para processos de resolução de litígios
  • Relatórios detalhados sobre resultados e tendências de litígios
  • Integração com gateways de pagamento e sistemas CRM
  • Centralised repository for historical dispute data to support long-term risk assessment and KYB reviews.
  • Calculations of net recovery rates to quantify the financial impact of the representment process.
  • Detection of repetitive cardholder behaviour to flag potential serial disputers before authorisation occurs.
  • Workflow queues to prioritise high-value disputes or those with the shortest remaining response windows.
See Gestão de litígios on your acquiring stack.

A short scoping call, then a written plan for your MIDs.

Candidatar-me agora

Perguntas sobre Gestão de litígios

Como é que a Cardflo agiliza o processo de resolução de litígios?

A Cardflo agiliza a resolução de litígios ao centralizar todas as informações relevantes e automatizar tarefas essenciais.

Isto inclui a recolha automática de provas, modelos de resposta pré-preenchidos e orientação clara do fluxo de trabalho, garantindo que os litígios são tratados de forma eficiente e consistente, desde o início até ao encerramento.

Posso personalizar os fluxos de trabalho de gestão de litígios?

Sim, a Cardflo oferece fluxos de trabalho de gestão de litígios personalizáveis. Pode definir fases específicas, atribuir responsabilidades e definir gatilhos com base no tipo de litígio, valor ou histórico do cliente.

Esta flexibilidade permite-lhe alinhar o processo com os seus requisitos operacionais.

Que tipos de litígios abrangem o sistema da Cardflo?

O sistema da Cardflo abrange vários tipos de litígios, incluindo transações não autorizadas, serviço não prestado, mercadoria não recebida e problemas de qualidade. A nossa plataforma foi concebida para gerir todo o espetro de litígios de titulares de cartões, oferecendo uma solução abrangente para comerciantes.

Can a merchant win a dispute if the customer claims they did not receive the goods?

Yes, but only by providing concrete evidence of delivery. This usually requires a tracking number that shows as 'delivered' to the customer's verified address, preferably with a signature or photographic proof if required by the scheme rules for that transaction value.

For digital goods, logs showing the customer's IP address, login times, and service usage are required. The burden of proof lies entirely with the merchant to demonstrate that the service was rendered or the physical item was successfully dispatched and received.

How does the dispute-to-transaction ratio affect a merchant's ability to process payments?

Acquirers and card schemes monitor this ratio closely to assess risk. If the ratio exceeds specific limits, usually 0.

9% or 1% depending on the network, the merchant is flagged. Consequences include higher interchange or scheme fees, the requirement of a rolling reserve, or the total termination of the Merchant Identification Number.

Effective dispute management aims to keep this ratio low by both preventing disputes through better service and identifying fraudulent claims that can be successfully contested.

What role does the MCC play in dispute management?

The Merchant Category Code (MCC) dictates the expected dispute profile for a business. Certain industries, like travel or digital gaming, are naturally higher risk.

Schemes apply different monitoring thresholds and evidence requirements based on the MCC. For example, a travel merchant may need to provide proof of a stay, whereas a retail merchant needs proof of shipping.

Accurate MCC assignment ensures that the dispute management logic is tailored to the specific regulatory and scheme requirements of that industry sector.

Começar

Pronto para a velocidade?

Fale-nos do seu negócio. Iremos apresentá-lo aos parceiros adquirentes e à rota certa, normalmente em menos de uma semana.

Candidatar-me agora
Candidatar-me agora